Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 12:12:46 -0400 From: "Scott I. Remick" <scott@...mick.net> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: OMP vs. OpenCL performance On 09/29/2017 09:44 AM, Frank Dittrich wrote: > Actually, john will provide that information : Ok here what I had gotten: ~/JohnTheRipper/run$ ./john --session=opencl --format=PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA512-opencl hash.txt Device 0: GeForce GTX 750 Using default input encoding: UTF-8 Loaded 1 password hash (PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA512-opencl, GRUB2 / OS X 10.8+ [PBKDF2-SHA512 OpenCL]) Cost 1 (iteration count) is 48543 for all loaded hashes So if the "48543" is what you thought would need to be over 500K to account for the speed, then I suppose maybe there is indeed a problem...? Currently been running 1 day, 13h, on phase 3/3 and 777p/s
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.