Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 15:44:55 +0200 From: Frank Dittrich <frank.dittrich@...lbox.org> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: OMP vs. OpenCL performance Am 29.09.2017 um 15:34 schrieb Scott I. Remick: > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017, at 03:10 AM, magnum wrote: >> I presume your hashes are in the order of 500,000 iterations. If not, >> that's too slow. > > I did some research and couldn't find a definitive answer to that, but I > wouldn't put it beyond Apple to use that many in MacOS in 2017. Perhaps > someone on this list knows. Actually, john will provide that information : Loaded 1 password hash (PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA512, GRUB2 / OS X 10.8+ [PBKDF2-SHA512 128/128 AVX 2x]) Cost 1 (iteration count) is 24213 for all loaded hashes or Loaded 11 password hashes with 10 different salts (PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA512, GRUB2 / OS X 10.8+ [PBKDF2-SHA512 128/128 AVX 2x]) Loaded hashes with cost 1 (iteration count) varying from 1000 to 37313 Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.