Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 20:04:08 -0400 From: Rich Rumble <richrumble@...il.com> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Custom Windows build 188.8.131.52 - What happened to zip2john? On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 6:57 PM, Glen B <lucky0106@....com> wrote: > Hi Robert et. al., > > Sorry for taking so long to respond - I've downloaded the updated > September build of 184.108.40.206. I'm happy to see that zip2john.exe is back! > Running it on my zip file produces the following ouput: > > ver 2.0 Labs.zip->Labs.pdf PKZIP Encr: cmplen=1838962, decmplen=2008077, > crc=7830B902 > > So that seems to be working well? The output hash is kind of odd - the > file I saved it to is 7,184KB in size, but the output format seems > normal enough? When I run john, however... > > .\run\john.exe --show .\zip.hash > Warning: '/dev/shm' does not exists or is not a directory. > I've had that error before, seems to be an environment issue, meaning if you run John from a Cygwin environment the issue I believe goes away. Otherwise there may have to be something done to the code to fix that issue. I don't think it's a hard error, JtR should just move past it. > POSIX shared memory objects require the existance of this directory. > Create the directory '/dev/shm' and set the permissions to 01777. > For instance on the command line: mkdir -m 01777 /dev/shm > This is the real problem > Warning: invalid UTF-8 seen reading .\zip.hash > 0 password hashes cracked, 0 left > The file seems to contain a non-UTF-8 string inside it, but again JtR should move past that... The hash may not be correct, is it possible to post it, perhaps privately to one of the developers (not me :) Try the command without the SHOW. > > It seems like john is having trouble reading the output of zip2john? > > Glen > > On 9/2/2017 6:52 PM, rs904c@...scape.net wrote: > > The symbolic link issue mentioned below in Cygwin is still broken, if you > > configure with: > > "--enable-ln-s ", which Use ln -s vs symlink.c wrappers (Cygwin only) > > > > So, I tested my configure without this, and all executables are working > now. > > > > I'm almost done with my testing and I'm about the release a new version > for > > Windows x64 on the custom build site. > > > > -Robert B. Harris from VA > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: rs904c@...scape.net [mailto:rs904c@...scape.net] > > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 11:24 PM > > To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com > > Subject: RE: [john-users] Custom Windows build 220.127.116.11 - What happened to > > zip2john? > > > > So seeing how this problem was just discovered, I'd like to hear that > > someone has either worked on the code to fix it, or they believe it is no > > longer a problem with the code. > > > > Then I'll compile a new bleeding for Windows, test this to confirm or > deny > > the problem's current status. Once the new version is confirmed fixed, > I'll > > put on the custom build site. > > > > --Robert B. Harris > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Glen B [mailto:lucky0106@....com] > > Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 10:22 PM > > To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com > > Subject: Re: [john-users] Custom Windows build 18.104.22.168 - What happened to > > zip2john? > > > > Hey Robert, > > > > I can confirm what you've found, the earlier build did have the proper > > executables. I hope I can test a build from you soon if you won't mind! > > > > Glen > > > > On 8/24/2017 6:53 PM, rs904c@...scape.net wrote: > >> Hey, I'm Robert and the one who contributes almost all of the builds > >> on the custom build site. > >> > >> I think there was something definitely wrong with the bleeding version > >> in March 2017, and possibly now, when building with cygwin. > >> > >> See below for more details. > >> > >> I tested all of the symbolic link files in the Windows build from > >> March 2017 that I did and I can confirm there seems to be a problem > >> with > > them. > >> These all fail to run: > >> > >> base64conv > >> gpg2john > >> hccap2john > >> keepass2john > >> putty2john > >> racf2john > >> rar2john > >> unafs > >> undrop > >> unique > >> unshadow > >> > >> I then checked the previous version I made > >> "John-the-Ripper-v1.8.0-jumbo-1-Win-64". > >> In this version there are no files that are symbolic links. These all > >> run fine. > >> > >> base64conv.exe > >> calc_stat.exe > >> cprepair.exe > >> dmg2john.exe > >> genmkvpwd.exe > >> gpg2john.exe > >> hccap2john.exe > >> john.exe > >> keepass2john.exe > >> keychain2john.exe > >> keyring2john.exe > >> keystore2john.exe > >> kwallet2john.exe > >> luks2john.exe > >> mkvcalcproba.exe > >> pfx2john.exe > >> putty2john.exe > >> pwsafe2john.exe > >> racf2john.exe > >> rar2john.exe > >> raw2dyna.exe > >> ssh2john.exe > >> tgtsnarf.exe > >> truecrypt_volume2john.exe > >> uaf2john.exe > >> unafs.exe > >> undrop.exe > >> unique.exe > >> unshadow.exe > >> wpapcap2john.exe > >> zip2john.exe > >> > >> -- Robert B. Harris from VA > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Solar Designer [mailto:solar@...nwall.com] > >> Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 3:55 PM > >> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com > >> Subject: Re: [john-users] Custom Windows build 22.214.171.124 - What happened > >> to zip2john? > >> > >> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 07:16:03PM +0000, Glen B wrote: > >>> I really liked the earlier versions of JtR that were self-contained > >>> and > >> didn't require downloading anything else to be honest. > >> > >> This build wasn't meant to require anything extra either. According > >> to what you said, it's just a bug. > >> > >>> If this is just a symlink though, what is it symlink-ing to? The john > >> binary? If so, couldn't I just run john directly? > >> > >> Yes. You could run "john" directly if you copy or rename it so that > >> it'd be called "zip2john". > >> > >> Alexander > >> > >> > >> --- > >> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > >> https://www.avast.com/antivirus > >> > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.