Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 22:57:47 +0000 From: Glen B <lucky0106@....com> To: "john-users@...ts.openwall.com" <john-users@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: Re: Custom Windows build 188.8.131.52 - What happened to zip2john? Hi Robert et. al., Sorry for taking so long to respond - I've downloaded the updated September build of 184.108.40.206. I'm happy to see that zip2john.exe is back! Running it on my zip file produces the following ouput: ver 2.0 Labs.zip->Labs.pdf PKZIP Encr: cmplen=1838962, decmplen=2008077, crc=7830B902 So that seems to be working well? The output hash is kind of odd - the file I saved it to is 7,184KB in size, but the output format seems normal enough? When I run john, however... .\run\john.exe --show .\zip.hash Warning: '/dev/shm' does not exists or is not a directory. POSIX shared memory objects require the existance of this directory. Create the directory '/dev/shm' and set the permissions to 01777. For instance on the command line: mkdir -m 01777 /dev/shm Warning: invalid UTF-8 seen reading .\zip.hash 0 password hashes cracked, 0 left It seems like john is having trouble reading the output of zip2john? Glen On 9/2/2017 6:52 PM, rs904c@...scape.net wrote: > The symbolic link issue mentioned below in Cygwin is still broken, if you > configure with: > "--enable-ln-s ", which Use ln -s vs symlink.c wrappers (Cygwin only) > > So, I tested my configure without this, and all executables are working now. > > I'm almost done with my testing and I'm about the release a new version for > Windows x64 on the custom build site. > > -Robert B. Harris from VA > > -----Original Message----- > From: rs904c@...scape.net [mailto:rs904c@...scape.net] > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 11:24 PM > To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com > Subject: RE: [john-users] Custom Windows build 220.127.116.11 - What happened to > zip2john? > > So seeing how this problem was just discovered, I'd like to hear that > someone has either worked on the code to fix it, or they believe it is no > longer a problem with the code. > > Then I'll compile a new bleeding for Windows, test this to confirm or deny > the problem's current status. Once the new version is confirmed fixed, I'll > put on the custom build site. > > --Robert B. Harris > > -----Original Message----- > From: Glen B [mailto:lucky0106@....com] > Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 10:22 PM > To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com > Subject: Re: [john-users] Custom Windows build 18.104.22.168 - What happened to > zip2john? > > Hey Robert, > > I can confirm what you've found, the earlier build did have the proper > executables. I hope I can test a build from you soon if you won't mind! > > Glen > > On 8/24/2017 6:53 PM, rs904c@...scape.net wrote: >> Hey, I'm Robert and the one who contributes almost all of the builds >> on the custom build site. >> >> I think there was something definitely wrong with the bleeding version >> in March 2017, and possibly now, when building with cygwin. >> >> See below for more details. >> >> I tested all of the symbolic link files in the Windows build from >> March 2017 that I did and I can confirm there seems to be a problem >> with > them. >> These all fail to run: >> >> base64conv >> gpg2john >> hccap2john >> keepass2john >> putty2john >> racf2john >> rar2john >> unafs >> undrop >> unique >> unshadow >> >> I then checked the previous version I made >> "John-the-Ripper-v1.8.0-jumbo-1-Win-64". >> In this version there are no files that are symbolic links. These all >> run fine. >> >> base64conv.exe >> calc_stat.exe >> cprepair.exe >> dmg2john.exe >> genmkvpwd.exe >> gpg2john.exe >> hccap2john.exe >> john.exe >> keepass2john.exe >> keychain2john.exe >> keyring2john.exe >> keystore2john.exe >> kwallet2john.exe >> luks2john.exe >> mkvcalcproba.exe >> pfx2john.exe >> putty2john.exe >> pwsafe2john.exe >> racf2john.exe >> rar2john.exe >> raw2dyna.exe >> ssh2john.exe >> tgtsnarf.exe >> truecrypt_volume2john.exe >> uaf2john.exe >> unafs.exe >> undrop.exe >> unique.exe >> unshadow.exe >> wpapcap2john.exe >> zip2john.exe >> >> -- Robert B. Harris from VA >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Solar Designer [mailto:solar@...nwall.com] >> Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 3:55 PM >> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com >> Subject: Re: [john-users] Custom Windows build 22.214.171.124 - What happened >> to zip2john? >> >> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 07:16:03PM +0000, Glen B wrote: >>> I really liked the earlier versions of JtR that were self-contained >>> and >> didn't require downloading anything else to be honest. >> >> This build wasn't meant to require anything extra either. According >> to what you said, it's just a bug. >> >>> If this is just a symlink though, what is it symlink-ing to? The john >> binary? If so, couldn't I just run john directly? >> >> Yes. You could run "john" directly if you copy or rename it so that >> it'd be called "zip2john". >> >> Alexander >> >> >> --- >> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >> https://www.avast.com/antivirus >>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.