Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 03:45:26 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Is there any high-speed beta code for nt-opencl, netntlmv2-opencel and mssql05-opencl? On 2014-09-23 21:24, Richard Miles wrote: > By masking + wordlist do you mean the same masking mode used by hashcat? I suppose it's basically like Hashcat's "hybrid attack" but I have tried neither. > What about the tradicional and good rules mode from john? :) They are generated on CPU. This might change some day but don't hold your breath waiting for it. > So, is this one (https://github.com/magnumripper/JohnTheRipper.git) which > supports generation on GPU? For netntlmv2 is it supported as well? It's the (non-default) bleeding-mask branch of that repo, yes. It's quirky but it's pretty fast. > LOL, it may be weird, but just to keep compatibility with the old legacy, > why not rename the ntlmv2-opencl to netntlmv2-opencl? Like I said, I consider netntlmv2 a bogus name. The CPU format should be renamed to NTLMv2, if anything. > Just for curious, why not? I mean, the speed that my computer is able to > read the wordlist file is much faster in comparison with my GPU and > wordlist with rules on john...so, why it's not worth? You suck royally at quoting. The reason there's no point in implementing fast formats until we have GPU-side candidate generation is they won't be any faster than the already existing CPU formats. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.