Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 19:54:40 +0400 From: Aleksey Cherepanov <aleksey.4erepanov@...il.com> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Re: existing collaboration tools suitable for MJohn On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:40:45PM +0200, Simon Marechal wrote: > On 05/23/2012 09:10 PM, Aleksey Cherepanov wrote: > > To the of that mail I convinced myself that request-tracker is a good > > choice but I am still have a feeling that I should at least look on > > one other solution before any further actions in this direction. > > Last time I looked at it I thought that this was proven software, but > that it needed a lot of customisation before being usable. And I > intended to use it as a request tracker ;) I think attack is some kind of request. Maybe it is too far similarity. > I did not look at the source code, but it is old perl, so it might be > even worse than a rails application. Did you try reading the source ? It > is highly likely that you will have to alter it if you go that way, so > having a quick look might give you a good idea of how hard it is going > to be. I do not think that it was frozen since its creation. I guess they updated it to newer versions. I just picked random perl file (request-tracker4/etc/upgrade/shrink_transactions_table.pl) from request-tracker and read it. At the beginning it contains: use 5.8.3; use strict; use warnings; It is promising. Thought Perl 5.8 was released in 2002 but 'grep -r "use 5"' says that only two files have such line. In general other contents of that file does not seem strange for me. So I think this is not too old perl. Do not I miss something? Regards, Aleksey Cherepanov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.