Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 19:37:26 +0200 From: pierzi <pierzi@...il.com> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Performance Considerations of stdin Hello Brad I've been using jtr in stdin mode with maskprocessor from hashcat tools, which seems to be one the fastest word generator... to be honest i didn't saw any performance difference between stdin and incremental mode. Best regards Bartosz 2012/5/18 Brad Tilley <brad@...ystems.com> > Hello John Users, > > What, if any, performance considerations are there when passing word > candidates to JTR via stdin? I plan on doing some tests to see first-hand, > but before doing so I wanted to ask here in case others have had some > experience with this. > > Basically, I'm wondering if a word generation program that passed words > into JTR via stdin would perform better than when JTR is doing both word > mangling and hash generation, hash testing, etc all by itself. > > ehco -n word | john --sdtin > > Has anyone had experience performance testing something such as this? > > Thanks for any advice, > > Brad > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.