Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 17:03:22 +0200 From: groszek <necro@...icon.pl> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Sha-256 On 07/30/2011 04:51 PM, Solar Designer wrote: > Thanks! I assume your changes relative to my sample code are too trivial > to be subject to copyright - is this your understanding too? > > In these files, the ALGORITHM_NAME strings don't make sense to me - > perhaps my convention was too cryptic for people to figure out what > these are supposed to mean. The rest looks reasonable. > > Alexander > Yup. I simply copied your raw-MD4 implementation and changed like.. 5 lines in code for each of the SHA-2 implementations. It worked for my needs so I was happy. Didn't submit before because of somewhat troublesome process for submitting patches. Hope it'll be useful to anyone now that it's out. With the new plugin system, hopefully, it'll be much easier in the future. :-) Can you please explain on what ALGORITHM_NAME means then? I assumed it's the length of hex representation of ciphertext. But didn't pay too much attention to that, as it had no visible effect on cracking.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.