Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:15:18 -0700
From: Alain Espinosa <alainesp@...il.com>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: NTLM and OpenCL 1.0

Part of the problem with low bandwidth it is my power plan was
"Balance" ("moderate power saving" for PCI express). When i put it
"High performance" ("off" for PCI express) i obtain the following
benchmark:

On 9/13/10, Alain Espinosa <alainesp@...il.com> wrote:
> <<<Executing kernel only>>>
> Time: 2075, c/s: 126.0 M
> Execut kernel: 2028

Time: 1950, c/s: 134.0 M
Execut kernel: 1919

> ...ighashgpu_v062 performs at 195 M..

Now performs at 200 M.

> <<<Executing nt_crypt_all_opencl>>>
> Time: 5912, c/s: 44.0 M
> Transfer keys: 2309, Bandwidth: 886MB/sec
> Execut kernel: 1827
> Transfer bbbs: 1729, Bandwidth: 592MB/sec

Time: 4914, c/s: 53.0 M
Transfer keys: 1155, Bandwidth: 1773MB/seg
Execut kernel: 1866
Transfer bbbs: 1862, Bandwidth: 549MB/seg

saludos,
alain

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.