Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 22:03:57 +0100 From: websiteaccess <websiteaccess@...il.com> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: JTR 126.96.36.199 with patches V2 - dict limits. On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 22:39:59 +0300, Solar Designer wrote: > On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 05:24:31PM +0100, websiteaccess wrote: >> I use the great 188.8.131.52 with jim's patches (v2). >> >> With very large dictionary (from 2 up to 7 gigas) I get the following >> error : >> >> ftell: Value too large to be stored in data type > > This is the expected behavior for a 32-bit build of JtR when a wordlist > exceeds 2 GB in size. You need a 64-bit build for wordlists this large. > > This was addressed on this mailing list before, including in response to > a message of yours (W.A.) - > > http://openwall.info/wiki/john/mailing-list-excerpts > > * On wordlists larger than 2 GB requiring a 64-bit build of JtR (2009/02/19) > http://www.openwall.com/lists/john-users/2009/02/19/3 > * Mac OS X specific (2009/06/14) > http://www.openwall.com/lists/john-users/2009/06/14/6 > * On enhancing JtR to support Large Files on 32-bit (2008/12/09) > http://www.openwall.com/lists/john-users/2008/12/09/2 > > Last time, you actually complained about not getting a "proper" error > (like the one above), but getting improper progress reporting. Maybe > something got fixed in Mac OS X since then. The behavior you're > reporting now is more correct. > > Of course, there's room for improvement of JtR itself, but nothing has > been done on this, so whatever was said in the old postings referenced > above still applies. > > Alexander > JTR (raw-md5) compiled with macos X 64 is 2 times slower than macos X sse2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.