Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 03:50:54 +0300 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: PVM or MPI? On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 11:41:46AM -0500, RB wrote: > Not being in the HPC crowd, I personally can't see much of a > difference - they're two implementations of one parallelization > paradigm: thread concurrency on heterogeneous machines. Correct. (Disclaimer: I am also not in the HPC crowd.) > There [was] > an MPI implementation of John during the 1.6.x days, and it worked > okay - I used it to some success on an 8-way P-III machine. Looking > around, it seems they've updated it: > http://www.bindshell.net/tools/johntheripper. There are several MPI hacks for John the Ripper. I have 5 of them here: ftp://ftp.openwall.com/pub/projects/john/contrib/mpi/ PVM was also mentioned on some occasions, but somehow noone has used it for John the Ripper (as far as I'm aware). I don't think either MPI or PVM should be used for an implementation that would be usable in practice - to actually audit password hashes rather than just demonstrate the concept in a university environment. This has been discussed on this mailing list before. -- Alexander Peslyak <solar at openwall.com> GPG key ID: 5B341F15 fp: B3FB 63F4 D7A3 BCCC 6F6E FC55 A2FC 027C 5B34 1F15 http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments -- To unsubscribe, e-mail john-users-unsubscribe@...ts.openwall.com and reply to the automated confirmation request that will be sent to you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.