Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 11:24:15 +0100 From: Simon Marechal <simon@...quise.net> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: output tested hashes thomas springer wrote: >>Why do you think that would let you speed things up? Precomputation? >>It doesn't work like that. > > > jup, precomputation, rainbowtables for the poor, if you like. > i'd like to have a few million "standard"-hashes with fixed salts, eg. > lm-hashes ready for lookup. Then you really should use rainbowcrack, or ophcrack (http://lasecwww.epfl.ch/~oechslin/projects/ophcrack/) which comes bundled with a rainbow table. If you feel inclined to have a time/memory tradeoff, you should have an efficient one. And if you really want to calculate hashes, i suggest you use something like a quick'n'dirty perl script, that will be slower but all in all i think it will save you a lot of time.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.