Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 09:47:14 +0100 From: thomas springer <thomas.springer@...il.com> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: output tested hashes > Why do you think that would let you speed things up? Precomputation? > It doesn't work like that. jup, precomputation, rainbowtables for the poor, if you like. i'd like to have a few million "standard"-hashes with fixed salts, eg. lm-hashes ready for lookup. > It's not as simple as that. John does not produce the ASCII-encoded yea, i should have known that it's not that simple! > The good news is that you _really_ shouldn't need those hashes. ;-) i'm short on processor-time... i recovered the ancient ntcrack to compute and list lm-hashes - it worked, slower, but fine! now I'm goin to compare the processorload for a lookup with john -wordlost... :) thanks for the reply -- thomas.springer@...il.com [nach mir der synflood.]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.