Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 14:16:37 +0100 From: Frank Dittrich <frank_dittrich@...mail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: dynamic_2000 - dynamic_2014 On 01/02/2014 01:55 PM, jfoug@....net wrote: > There are some caveats here (there always are). Off the top of my head, you will end up with having something be in dyna_2 format, get cracked by dyna_2002, and then get written out as dyna_2002. So there are some nuances that may have to be addressed, other than simply passing the valid check. This is not a trivial request, but it is not rocket science either. We could make dynamic_2002 accept dynamic_2 and dynamic_2002, but use dynamic_2 as the canonical representation (which gets written to .pot files). Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.