Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 02:07:02 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: AMD GCN ISA development Lukas, Sayantan, Daniel - Can one/two/all of you please respond to Ronak below, and to further questions/comments he might have? I don't have time now, but I dislike leaving postings without a response. Thanks, Alexander P.S. I am top-posting because I do not actually reply to Ronak, but rather I quote his entire messages for others to reply to it. For actual replies, I prefer inline quoting. So please do not take this instance of top-posting as an example that it's the right thing to do - usually it is not, in my opinion. ;-) (But there are exceptions.) On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 07:02:56PM +0530, Ronak wrote: > Hi, > While trying to align .isa in the inner elf of .elf, I had this thought, > how kernel is going to run, if we decide to update .il and .isa > simultaneously, such that each update will be different. With this, we have > inconsistent kernel. Now two questions need to be asked.. > ** which update will actually run > ** Updating both files, will it add to the flexibility of optimizing > opencl kernels. > > > Regards
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.