Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 11:56:00 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: minor raw-sha1-ng pull request On 19 Apr, 2013, at 6:33 , Tavis Ormandy <taviso@...xchg8b.com> wrote: > Hey Magnum, I noticed I could pull a bit of work out of the crypt inner loop > and do it during set_key for cheaper. Also a small amount of work could be > moved into crypt (to vectorize it). It's not a huge difference, but I think > it's obviously correct. > > https://github.com/magnumripper/JohnTheRipper/pull/280/files This is merged. > BTW, would you like me to look into handling longer passwords without > burning cycles for the common (len <= 15) case? I don't think it's possible > to do it for free, but maybe it won't be too expensive. That would be nice, and then we'd give it higher precedence than the slower raw-sha1 so auto-loading would pick your format. Technically, we could let John chose format at init, based on --min-length and --max-length if given. But that would probably just be confusing. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.