Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 19:00:30 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Bug report: specific hex salted hash failure On 18 Apr, 2013, at 16:41 , jfoug <jfoug@....net> wrote: > Yes, this was a bug (recently introduced). Included are patches for > bleeding (and memdbg) branch, and unstable branch. Also fixed was a pretty > significant performance issue in valid(). We were always calling sprintf 10 > times, on each candidate, even if there were not $$Fx values that 'should' > have been looked for. Reworked the check of flags, so we ONLY do the > sprintf IF the format should contain one of those special salt sections. committed magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.