Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:51:52 -0700 From: Bit Weasil <bitweasil@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: phpass OpenCL and CUDA Have fun against hashcat... and if you do beat him out, I'd suggest *not* advertising it. This only serves to light a fire under him and he releases a beta that's faster. I've done this a few times... On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Lukas Odzioba <lukas.odzioba@...il.com>wrote: > 2012/6/26 Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>: > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 03:32:27AM +0200, Lukas Odzioba wrote: > >> 2012/6/26 Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>: > >> > 1. There's a function called "cuda_md5" - rename it. > >> > > >> > 2. Make use of rotate() and bitselect(). > >> I'll send fix for that in a moment. My target is to make vectorized > >> code work properly so even if code is dirty it should not stay there > >> for long. > > > > Sure. Yet the non-vectorized code is to stay for jumbo-6, right? > Yes. > >> > Are we releasing with these lower speeds? > >> Yes, there were no any major changes. Lower speeds are because test > >> vector change. > >> Previously we're testing just one password, now 15 passwords with > >> increasing length. > > > > I think the increasing lengths are only in the CUDA code, right? > > Thus, the lower OpenCL speed is solely from the reverted code, right? > Yes. > > Do you happen to know what password lengths the published hashcat speeds > > are for? > I do not know, but I'll check that later. I am assuming you're curious > more about AMD speeds? > > Lukas > Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.