Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 03:50:50 +0200 From: Lukas Odzioba <lukas.odzioba@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: phpass OpenCL and CUDA 2012/6/26 Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>: > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 03:32:27AM +0200, Lukas Odzioba wrote: >> 2012/6/26 Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>: >> > 1. There's a function called "cuda_md5" - rename it. >> > >> > 2. Make use of rotate() and bitselect(). >> I'll send fix for that in a moment. My target is to make vectorized >> code work properly so even if code is dirty it should not stay there >> for long. > > Sure. Yet the non-vectorized code is to stay for jumbo-6, right? Yes. >> > Are we releasing with these lower speeds? >> Yes, there were no any major changes. Lower speeds are because test >> vector change. >> Previously we're testing just one password, now 15 passwords with >> increasing length. > > I think the increasing lengths are only in the CUDA code, right? > Thus, the lower OpenCL speed is solely from the reverted code, right? Yes. > Do you happen to know what password lengths the published hashcat speeds > are for? I do not know, but I'll check that later. I am assuming you're curious more about AMD speeds? Lukas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.