Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 23:14:30 +0100 From: Samuele Giovanni Tonon <samu@...uxasylum.net> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: RAR format finally proper On 03/06/12 23:02, magnum wrote: > On 03/06/2012 10:56 PM, Samuele Giovanni Tonon wrote: >> On 03/06/12 19:47, magnum wrote: >>> I'll give it a try just to start learning OpenCL but I don't expect it >>> to end up in something committable :) >>> >>> The current SHA1 code only does one block, right? I will need one more >>> like the OpenSSL ones, with update(). >> >> rather than the update() part which in the end is just an append, it's >> missing the code for strings more than 64 byte long by changing properly >> the 5 IV; need to say that from some test i did in C the update part >> seems the one that is crucial in rar. > > It seems http://royger.org/opencl/ has an optional version that "is > prepared to run blocks longer than 512-bits". Hopefully that code is > complete, I'll check it out later. yes, that's the one i started from one year ago, it's quite clear code tough not optimized :-) cheers Samuele
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.