Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 23:02:35 +0100 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: RAR format finally proper On 03/06/2012 10:56 PM, Samuele Giovanni Tonon wrote: > On 03/06/12 19:47, magnum wrote: >> I'll give it a try just to start learning OpenCL but I don't expect it >> to end up in something committable :) >> >> The current SHA1 code only does one block, right? I will need one more >> like the OpenSSL ones, with update(). > > rather than the update() part which in the end is just an append, it's > missing the code for strings more than 64 byte long by changing properly > the 5 IV; need to say that from some test i did in C the update part > seems the one that is crucial in rar. It seems http://royger.org/opencl/ has an optional version that "is prepared to run blocks longer than 512-bits". Hopefully that code is complete, I'll check it out later. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.