Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:10:35 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Dragonfly BSD SHA2 On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 08:43:08AM +0100, magnum wrote: > On 01/18/2012 11:08 AM, Solar Designer wrote: > > You may need to make two or more 64-bit installs of DragonFly (different > > versions - e.g., just after they introduced this SHA-2 stuff vs. latest). > > There has only been one release with these crypt types included. I think > they should (at least) include the enclosed diff in order not to break > things in the next release. This would at least stop things from > changing between builds. But I am not gonna try persuade them, they > don't seem interested anyway. We need to make them aware of your patch at least. I will do that. The only response I got so far is this: https://mobile.twitter.com/_xhr_/status/159200543363969024 "@jedisct1 @Openwall Yes, we know it. But unfortunately nobody cared to fix it ... yet." _xhr_ is a DragonFly committer. Thanks! Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.