Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:59:42 +0100 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Dragonfly BSD SHA2 On 01/18/2012 11:08 AM, Solar Designer wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 09:06:41AM +0100, magnum wrote: >> The 32-bit DragonFly formats are now confirmed correct for hashes from a >> real system. >> I suppose I need to make two separate formats for the 64-bit versions. > > Yes. I think they can share the same source files with the 32-bit > formats, but provide extra format structs. 64-bit versions are now supported. They share source files but show up as different formats, eg. dragonfly3-32 vs dragonfly3-64 (where 3 obviously stands for $3$, ie. SHA-256). When auto-loading, 64-bit gets precedence. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.