Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 18:52:39 -0500 From: "JimF" <jfoug@....net> To: <john-dev@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: Re: Problems with the 0007 patch From: "magnum" <rawsmooth@...dband.net> >I do not think your fix was busted, it was just fixed for the case of xBuf >!= 1 > > So if your fix ever worked for sequential buffers (xBuf=1), it will now > also work for interleaved ones. Now that I have had a chance to unwind, and actaully look at the patches, I see what I had missed when writing them the first time. Yes, your fixes are correct. > I'm more worried about the 0010 patch. Did that break something? I *think* > it should not. I have not had a chance to look at 0010 other than looking at the patch code. It appears good. I wonder if this would be applicable to mscash1, or any other 'fast' format? Jim
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.