Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 14:49:46 +0100 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: passwords@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: keyed hash vs. encryption On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 02:59:39AM -0700, Jim Fenton wrote: > On 3/15/18 1:08 PM, Solar Designer wrote: > > Now in another thread, Arnold argues in favor of changing the SHOULD to > > SHALL, and you haven't objected yet: > > > > http://www.openwall.com/lists/passwords/2018/03/15/1 > > > > So I feel I have to: please either leave it at SHOULD, or please allow > > the hash encryption approach as an option as well (primary option even?) > > "yet"? I didn't realize there was a deadline. Of course, there was not, and by "yet" I meant precisely that you still could comment if you wanted to, which you did now - thanks! > SP 800-63B was published last summer after considerable public comment Yeah. The process looked just right to me. I regret not commenting on the draft in time. Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.