Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 02:59:39 -0700 From: Jim Fenton <fenton@...epopcorn.net> To: passwords@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: keyed hash vs. encryption On 3/15/18 1:08 PM, Solar Designer wrote: > Now in another thread, Arnold argues in favor of changing the SHOULD to > SHALL, and you haven't objected yet: > > http://www.openwall.com/lists/passwords/2018/03/15/1 > > So I feel I have to: please either leave it at SHOULD, or please allow > the hash encryption approach as an option as well (primary option even?) "yet"? I didn't realize there was a deadline. I'm traveling and jet-lagged (California -> London). BTW, if anyone here will be at the IETF meeting this coming week, look me up. As I said to Arnold a little while ago, SP 800-63B was published last summer after considerable public comment, and I do not expect it to be changed (except possibly for small errata) until it is ready for another revision, with more public comment, etc. I haven't time to review all the yescrypt detail you provided right now. -Jim
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.