Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 11:46:01 +0100 From: Daniel Cegiełka <daniel.cegielka@...il.com> To: owl-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: virtualization in openwall 2013/1/3 Zenny <garbytrash@...il.com>: > Zdrasdsviche! > > Belated happy new year 2013 to all Owl team! > > BTW, I would like to know whether anyone has experience with > virtualization like xen or kvm with xen in Owl? KVM is a bad choice - another user-space issue. Thats why the qubes developers decided to use xen (see qubes doc's). > The reason I am asking is because a Polish distro Qubes-OS claims it > is secured. And I could not find anything more secured than Owl. If > xen or kvm with qemu be integrated to Owl, how will it scale in terms > of performance and security? > > Any inputs would be appreciated! Spacibo bolshoi! Qubes is a system for the desktop - Owl for servers. You can't easily transfer qubes functions (eg copying etc.) to Owl... but J. Rutkowska and Wojtczuk approach is very interesting. Daniel > > /zenny
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.