Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 03:50:10 +0300 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: owl-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: RE : First install On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 12:40:05AM +0100, Estrade Matthieu wrote: > I setup too my network card and did some stuff with. Sometimes, I get > "neighbour overflow", I dunno what it is... This sounds like a network driver problem, but with so little detail I can't even grep kernel sources for it appropriately. > Anyway, I am happy with this new system... which is very clean. > I will now try to compile apache as you wrote in the TODO file. > You are requiring apache 1.3.x so now 1.3.27 but why not 2.0 ? Russian Apache is still based on 1.3.x (and I think that's for some reasons not limited to the extra effort it'd take to update it). I don't want to maintain two versions. > 2.0 is more secure Is it? (I don't care about its properties on Win32.) > and really more powerfull than 1.3.x. What specific features of 2.0 do you think would benefit Owl users? > I will try to compile both. -- /sd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.