Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 02:07:44 +0400 From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...linux.org> To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: strace On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 11:23:59AM +0400, Solar Designer wrote: > On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 03:26:01AM +0400, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > > I see two options, either to apply strace-4.7-i386_regs.diff proposed by > > Pavel (the patch is definitely correct and could be applied without > > additional testing), or build a snapshot from strace.git HEAD (commit > > 07f022903e077a04fefd0c6132a706b7a50a7067 at this moment). > > > > The first variant is straightforward, anybody who remembers how to use cvs > > can do it. > > > > The second variant is not as risky as it may sound because strace.git HEAD > > is quite stable now. I suppose I can manage it despite of my rusty cvs > > skills, I was going to test strace-4.8 (planned to be released in May) on > > Owl-current before the release anyway. > > I think you're the one to make the determination. Thanks! It's strace-4.8, I've uploaded tarball and made necessary commits. -- ldv Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.