[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPLrYEQK_=e95oPthOdHap3E9+eBPDYeaRkkvu_-s_2uFRnyDA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 20:39:51 +0200
From: Daniel Cegiełka <daniel.cegielka@...il.com>
To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: procps-3.2.8
In procps-3.2.5-suse-top-cpus.diff:
switch (c) {
case '1':
+ if ((Screen_rows < (Cpu_tot+4)) && (Cpu_tot > 1))
+ show_msg(err_num_cpus);
+ else {
#ifdef WARN_NOT_SMP
if (Cpu_tot > 1) TOGw(Curwin, View_CPUSUM);
else show_msg(err_smp);
#else
TOGw(Curwin, View_CPUSUM);
#endif
+ }
break;
but the new version of procps has a similar solution:
switch (c) {
case '1':
if (Cpu_tot+7 > Screen_rows && CHKw(Curwin, View_CPUSUM)) {
show_msg(err_num_cpus);
break;
}
#ifdef WARN_NOT_SMP
if (Cpu_tot > 1) TOGw(Curwin, View_CPUSUM);
else show_msg(err_smp);
#else
I understand that I leave as it is in the new code, right?
Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
