Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 02:47:47 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Owl 4.0 priorities Vasiliy, On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:33:34PM +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote: > Note that as for LAMP the question of how we'll package PHP, Apache, > etc. is still opened for now (as RPMs like other Owl stuff, or under > /opt/, or under pkgsrc, etc.). I thought we already decided on using RPMs for LAMP. I did. The only uncertainty is regarding which RPMs get into the base system and which become add-ons, if any. Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.