Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 23:33:34 +0400
From: Vasiliy Kulikov <>
Subject: Re: Owl 4.0 priorities

Hello Igmar,

On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 14:29 +0200, Igmar Palsenberg wrote:
> >> * Packetize new stuff / update existing.  ppp*, network sniffing tools,
> >>  LAMP, parted, etc.
> > 
> > Yes.  Some of these might be a higher priority than some of the tasks
> > above, so some of this work should proceed in parallel.
> Can we specify those ? I'll be more then happy to assist in packaging / reviewing stuff.

Most of them are specified in doc/TODO file:;content-type=text%2Fplain

Note that as for LAMP the question of how we'll package PHP, Apache,
etc. is still opened for now (as RPMs like other Owl stuff, or under
/opt/, or under pkgsrc, etc.).

I've addressed your other questions on owl-users.



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.