Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 23:33:34 +0400 From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com> To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Owl 4.0 priorities Hello Igmar, On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 14:29 +0200, Igmar Palsenberg wrote: > >> * Packetize new stuff / update existing. ppp*, network sniffing tools, > >> LAMP, parted, etc. > > > > Yes. Some of these might be a higher priority than some of the tasks > > above, so some of this work should proceed in parallel. > > Can we specify those ? I'll be more then happy to assist in packaging / reviewing stuff. Most of them are specified in doc/TODO file: http://cvsweb.openwall.com/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/Owl/doc/TODO?rev=1.207;content-type=text%2Fplain Note that as for LAMP the question of how we'll package PHP, Apache, etc. is still opened for now (as RPMs like other Owl stuff, or under /opt/, or under pkgsrc, etc.). I've addressed your other questions on owl-users. Thanks, -- Vasiliy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.