Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 19:26:47 +0400 From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com> To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: /tmp fs type Elia, On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 15:56 +0200, yersinia wrote: > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote: > > Openwall support pam_namespace already ( > http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/talks/sage-2006/PolyInstantiatedDirectories.html) > ? It is not only for selinux system. Just for curiosity. We don't. Is it useful for legacy /tmp/ issue only? We deal with it with pam_mktemp: http://cvsweb.openwall.com/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/Owl/packages/pam_mktemp/pam_mktemp/README?rev=1.2;content-type=text%2Fplain It is simpler than using separate namespaces and it doesn't rely on any special kernel code. Thanks, -- Vasiliy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.