|
|
Message-ID: <20110323165514.GA26658@albatros>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 19:55:14 +0300
From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: iproute2 2.6.38
Solar, all -
I'm updating iproute2 to 2.6.38 and picking some patches from ALT Linux.
http://sisyphus.ru/ru/srpm/Sisyphus/iproute2/patches
Patches I want to include:
iproute2-2.4.7-alt-rtacct_daemon.diff
iproute2-2.6.18-alt-ifcfg.diff
iproute2-2.6.18-alt-ip-man.diff
iproute2-2.6.28-alt-format_not_a_string_literal_and_no_format_arguments.diff
I'm not sure about the patch iproute2-2.6.35-fixrouteget.patch:
http://sisyphus.ru/ru/srpm/Sisyphus/iproute2/patches
https://bugzilla.altlinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23872
I cannot reproduce the bug with these steps; also I'm not sure about the
fix itself - filter.cloned is set to 2 in iproute_get() and results of
all boolean expressions are well defined, e.g. !0 == 1 and !!15 == 1, so
maybe authors of the code might want to compare 2 and 0 or 2 and 1.
I didn't try to understand ip's logic, but the patch itself looks
suspicious to me.
The same with iproute2-2.6.25-segfault.patch:
http://sisyphus.ru/ru/srpm/Sisyphus/iproute2/patches/2
https://bugzilla.altlinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15409
I cannot reproduce the segfault and IMO the patch makes no sense - it is
a plain copy-paste from strncpy's manpage.
I don't want to include them unless someone is able to reproduce these bugs.
About packetizing new executables:
I don't know what it is, it has no documentation:
/sbin/genl
These are 2 bash script wrappers of ip:
/sbin/routef
/sbin/routel
And I suppose we still don't want to packetize arpd, right?
About documentation:
%doc RELNOTES examples
%doc README.distribution README.iproute2+tc README.lnstat
Thanks,
--
Vasiliy Kulikov
http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.