[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 16:56:56 +0200
From: "Dr. Christopher Kunz" <info@...istopher-kunz.de>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: New Linux LPE via GSMIOC_SETCONF_DLCI?
Hi,
> There are two exploits in Yurii's repo above, according to Yurii for two
> different bugs. The above is one of them. Perhaps also try the other?
The two exploit versions are for different kernels. The 6.5 exploit
doesn't compile on the Debian 12 6.1 kernel, and no Debian version
currently distributes a 6.5 kernel, AFAICT. I used
ExploitGSM_5_15_to_6_1/ExploitGSM and it worked.
> I don't know, and apparently it'd need to be two CVEs for two bugs that
> Yurii exploits.
Possibly. I'm definitely out of my depth trying to analyze which bugs
are being exploited.
> CVE-2023-52564: Revert "tty: n_gsm: fix UAF in gsm_cleanup_mux"
> https://lists.openwall.net/linux-cve-announce/2024/03/02/54
>
> Maybe CVE-2023-52564 is one of the bugs Yurii exploits, or maybe not.
> I didn't look into this closely enough to tell.
Apparently not. Debian 12 "Bookworm" currently runs this kernel:
Linux debianexploitgsm 6.1.0-18-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian
6.1.76-1 (2024-02-01) x86_64 GNU/Linux
According to the changelog, this kernel has the fix for CVE-2023-52564
included:
- Revert "tty: n_gsm: fix UAF in gsm_cleanup_mux"
(from
https://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/l/linux-signed-amd64/linux-signed-amd64_6.1.76+1_changelog)
Still, the exploit works, so it must exploit a different issue.
Just my two cents,
--cku
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
