[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 11:24:08 -0700
From: Kurt H Maier <khm@...ops.net>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer
Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer
Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)
On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 03:09:21PM +0100, Hanno Böck wrote:
> FWIW it only takes a basically trivial fuzz target on the affected
> function to find this bug with libfuzzer.
I'm not sure what the value is of all this Monday-morning
quarterbacking, from 'basically trivial' fuzzing to code-quality
comparisons of hypothetical Rust ports. OpenSSL's development process
has a bad rap, and there are definitely some easy wins to be had.
Posting "if they'd only adopted my pet practice" to oss-sec isn't fixing
anything in the OpenSSL project. Please consider directing fuzzing
advice and PL theory directly to the project? I agree there would be
benefit to this stuff, but dunking on them on unrelated lists isn't
getting the medicine to the patient.
Respectfully,
khm
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
