[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 17:42:33 +0800
From: Zhang Xiao <xiao.zhang@...driver.com>
To: Mohammad Tausif Siddiqui <msiddiqu@...hat.com>,
oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: xiao.zhang@...driver.com
Subject: Re: Contributing Back
在 2020/7/23 下午4:21, Mohammad Tausif Siddiqui 写道:
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 12:12 AM Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com
> <mailto:solar@...nwall.com>> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 03:37:03PM +0800, Zhang Xiao wrote:
> > ??? 2020/7/12 ??????1:58, Solar Designer ??????:
> > > On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 05:33:20PM +0800, Zhang Xiao wrote:
> > >> And, I have another point want to discuss. As we know,
> sometimes, the CVE and NVD website don't upgrade their web page
> timely. For example:
> > >>
> > >> the security maillist had an encrypted mail called "curl:
> overwrite local file with -J" in 20200617. It was a
> "pre-notification about a security advisory about to ship next
> week in sync with our next curl release", for CVE-2020-8177. On
> curl's git tree, that very bug did been fixed and released in
> 20200621:
> > >> https://github.com/curl/curl/commit/8236aba5854
> > >>
> > >> But, till now, both cve.mitre.org <http://cve.mitre.org> and
> nvd.nist.gov <http://nvd.nist.gov> still mark this CVE as "RESERVED":
> > >> https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-8177
> > >> https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-8177
> <https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-8177>
> > >>
> > >> So I wonder if that is also an contribution to remind them,
> if so, any advises to make it? And If it ca be defined as an
> contribution, we can take it. :-)
> > > We've received some responses in this thread regarding the
> specific
> > > example above, but I'd like more general responses please. Is
> there a
> > > general task Wind River can reasonably help with for getting
> CVE details
> > > published for issues that pass the distros and/or oss-security
> lists,
> > > and how exactly could they help with that?
> >
> > Actually, we are glad to make it for some customers are also pay
> > attention on these official web pages. We suppose it will be easy to
> > make it through the "notify a vulnerability publication
> > <https://cveform.mitre.org/>". But after I submitted the request
> I just
> > get a reply as "This CVE ID has been reserved by the CNA
> Hackerone and
> > we are currently waiting on them to submit the details." Seems
> only "the
> > CNA Hackerone" can make it. I have no idea on how to notify the
> "the CNA
> > Hackerone " to push it. :-(п╠Б∙░ Anyway, if possible we are glad
> to make it.
>
> Once again, I think CVE-2020-8177 is more of an exception than the
> rule.
> I would be more interested in comments by "CVE experts" on whether the
> task Xiao proposes and volunteers for is in general worthwhile or not,
> and why. Would similar "notify a vulnerability publication" reminders
> be desirable for issues that got the CVE IDs from one of the CNAs
> on the
> distros list?
>
>
> Xiao, Alexander,
>
> I think the ball is on the CNA: Hackerone side to get it published to
> MITRE, so
> that they can show it up on their page.
>
> CNAs are provided with weekly reports by the root CNA: MITRE, which lists
> Reserved But Public "RBP" CVEs owned by that CNA, irrespective of
> whether the
> CVE was assigned on distros list or elsewhere. That closes the
> reminder loop.
>
> There's no pull request for CVE-2020-8177 at
> https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelist/pulls
> We cannot determine if they used the alternative, web
> form:https://cveform.mitre.org/ <https://cveform.mitre.org/>
>
> You may want to reach Hackerone from the CNA contacts
> <https://cve.mitre.org/cve/request_id.html#cna_participants>, for this
> exception of delay.
>
For these two CVEs, I mailed to support@...kerone.com ten days ago but
haven't get any reply yet. :-(
Thanks
Xiao
> Kind regards
> --
>
> Tausif Siddiqui, PRODUCT SECURITY
>
> 0EE1 F6BF 8991 9A65 0A79 A0A7 5849 60EC 88B8 2C71
>
> secalert@...hat.com
> <https://access.redhat.com/security/team/contact> for urgent response.
>
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Download attachment "pEpkey.asc" of type "application/pgp-keys" (2461 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
