Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2019 22:09:04 +0200
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Tavis Ormandy <taviso@...il.com>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
	oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: stack buffer overflow in fbdev

On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 11:03:01AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Completely untested patch attached. There are probably better ways to do this.
> 
> Adding the proper people to the cc, and quoting Tavis' email in its entirety.
> 
> Daniel - you got added despite not being explicitly listed as
> maintainer because you've touched fbdev/core/ more than most lately,
> plus you know edid anyway. As such: "tag, you're it, sucker".

Yeah I also realized with regrets that get_maintainers thinks I'm
responsible for fbdev core :-/

Wrt the bug: I had a multi-paragraph explanation here about how fbmon.c
edid parser is only used by old crap drivers, and not when you have a
drm-kms driver providing the fbdev emulation (like pretty much every
modern system). Also that the version in fbmon.c seriously lacks compared
to the drm_edid.c one.

And then I ran grep and noticed it's dead code. The last user disappeared
in 34280340b1dc ("fbdev: Remove unused SH-Mobile HDMI driver") from 2015.
I'll type a patch for 5.4 to remove this outright.

Cheers, Daniel

PS: git log -G disappoints by not using all the cores I have here ..

> 
>                 Linus
> 
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 5:35 PM Tavis Ormandy <taviso@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello, during a conversation on twitter we noticed a stack buffer
> > overflow in fbdev with malicious edid data:
> >
> > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/22051d9c4a57d3b4a8b5a7407efc80c71c7bfb16/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmon.c#L1033
> >
> > There is enough space to have 52 1-byte length values, which makes svd_n
> > 52, then make the final value length 0x1f (the maximum), which makes
> > svd_n 83 and overflows the 64 byte stack buffer svd[] with controlled
> > data.
> >
> > This requires a malicious monitor / projector / etc, so pretty low impact.
> >
> > I pulled out the code to make a demo (I removed the checksum, but it
> > doesnt prevent the bug):
> >
> > https://gist.github.com/taviso/923776e633cb8fb1ab847cce761a0f10
> >
> > This was discovered by Nico Waisman of Semmle.
> >
> > Tavis.
> >
> > --
> > -------------------------------------
> > taviso@....lonestar.org | finger me for my pgp key.
> > -------------------------------------------------------

>  drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmon.c | 8 +++++++-
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmon.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmon.c
> index 3558a70a6664..2ab1fd6e33b7 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmon.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmon.c
> @@ -1030,7 +1030,9 @@ void fb_edid_add_monspecs(unsigned char *edid, struct fb_monspecs *specs)
>  		if (type == 2) {
>  			for (i = pos; i < pos + len; i++) {
>  				u8 idx = edid[pos + i] & 0x7f;
> -				svd[svd_n++] = idx;
> +				if (svd_n < sizeof(svd))
> +					svd[svd_n] = idx;
> +				svd_n++;
>  				pr_debug("N%sative mode #%d\n",
>  					 edid[pos + i] & 0x80 ? "" : "on-n", idx);
>  			}
> @@ -1044,6 +1046,10 @@ void fb_edid_add_monspecs(unsigned char *edid, struct fb_monspecs *specs)
>  		pos += len + 1;
>  	}
>  
> +	/* Evil monitor? */
> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(svd_n > sizeof(svd)))
> +		return;
> +
>  	block = edid + edid[2];
>  
>  	DPRINTK("  Extended Detailed Timings\n");


-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.