Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 18:58:39 +0100 From: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org> To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Cc: hanno@...eck.de, cve-assign@...re.org Subject: Re: Re: Heap Overflow in PCRE Hi MITRE team, On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 12:00:31AM -0500, cve-assign@...re.org wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > > https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/29-Heap-Overflow-in-PCRE.html > > This is CVE-2015-8380. > > The other PCRE issues have the consecutive IDs from CVE-2015-8381 to > CVE-2015-8395 inclusive. See the URLs such as: > > https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2015-8381 I have a question about CVE-2015-8384, according to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287623 the fixing commit in upstream VCS is r1558, but (cf. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287623#c6) CVE-2015-3210 was assigned for the issue fixed by the same revision r1558. Should any of those two CVE be rejected? Regards, Salvatore
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.