Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 18:00:51 -0500
From: "sec@...entropy.us" <sec@...entropy.us>
To: cve-assign@...re.org
Cc: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Yoast Wordpress SEO Plugin <= 2.1.1 Stored, Authenticated XSS

Thank you for investigating. I agree that since this was never patched there don't need to be two separate CVE identifiers, but it does seem a little odd to create a new 2012 CVE. In any case, at least it now has an identifier.

Thanks again,
Charles

> On Jun 21, 2015, at 10:59 AM, cve-assign@...re.org wrote:
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
>> https://inventropy.us/blog/yoast-seo-plugin-cross-site-scripting-vulnerability/
>> https://wordpress.org/plugins/wordpress-seo/changelog/
> 
> See http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2012-6692 for
> the XSS issue related to the "everyone can make a post. This post is
> then validate by an admin user. So everyone can use the security
> breach to execute javascript in admin" threat model on the
> https://wordpress.org/support/topic/security-issue-with-post-title-field-xss-vulnerability
> page from 2012-10-31.
> 
> It appears that the outcome is that the XSS payload is stored and then
> immediately reflected. Probably the highest risk is from the stored
> XSS, but the reflected aspect is also relevant if the admin encounters
> a malicious web site while logged into WordPress.
> 
> However, that 2012-10-31 page also says:
> 
>  - connect you on admin of your site
>  - go to url : [www.yoursite.com]/wp-admin/post-new.php?post_title=<script>alert('There is a problem');</script>
>  - The alert message is displaying !
> 
>  => CSRF : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-site_request_forgery
> 
> Is (or was) there a separate CSRF vulnerability, of interest to an
> attacker who wants to make a post (without any XSS payload) with the
> admin's credentials?
> 
> 
> Finally, you mentioned:
> 
>> the plugin author said that it had already been patched at the time.
> 
>>> This was already patched in 1.3
> 
> Apparently this refers to:
> 
>  http://plugins.svn.wordpress.org/wordpress-seo/trunk/changelog.txt
> 
>  = 1.3 =
> 
>  * Long list of small fixes and improvements to code best practices
>  after Sucuri review. Fixes 3 small security issues.
> 
> We don't know whether there was an earlier incomplete fix to the
> metabox functionality, so we aren't currently assigning a different
> CVE ID for versions before 1.3.
> 
> - -- 
> CVE assignment team, MITRE CVE Numbering Authority
> M/S M300
> 202 Burlington Road, Bedford, MA 01730 USA
> [ PGP key available through http://cve.mitre.org/cve/request_id.html ]
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (SunOS)
> 
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVht6kAAoJEKllVAevmvmska0IALWeV0XUgZnR55gmkkcG3eQj
> zYKi+tIF3l6+e15h5JjxFcdvoND+DqyMgpko+0Y5qO+ret/lFRPWjfZi8IE/QLXl
> FNiCSKA9k0s+cte+rcsI+UPp3iUC9aG0XkHCD0s5HU27Zd2N6dzWJiJEyy+x9LzN
> ERt20Vmb/zgh2oI5CWzFgtyLE4dQ6svJG9EKEtZxDaBJWFKB2icbpQ0Bwztwsbe4
> eWjaQnMF+vwb7jFJL99TXzDKFuyVIg9fIOlBj7bEHXSTmhkFiilVaXMF/n2LKIxa
> oKrgmmQ9DkZtjPJeBWM7uEiDg6gj5I/+sJ6XIqLzCr5PKsSJIxMq3dVvfTOwkSc=
> =TGMg
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.