Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 10:27:40 +0100 From: Jean-Baptiste Kempf <jb@...eolan.org> To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com> Cc: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com, Assign a CVE Identifier <cve-assign@...re.org>, VideoLAN Security Team <security@...eolan.org> Subject: Re: CVE request: BD-J implementation in libbluray On 23 Feb, Florian Weimer wrote : > Missing Java Security Manager sandboxing mechanism / feature in the > org.videolan.BDJLoader class The code corresponding to: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959433 is gone from newer release. You should upgrade, since we don't support old releases. As for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959434 "Fixing it would not change anything. Xlet (that requests the mount, or is being executed from the mount) could as well uncompress the files by self where it wants, even download other files from internet." So, maybe you want to have a full Xlet sandboxing? Or is it something else? -- Jean-Baptiste Kempf http://www.jbkempf.com/ - +33 672 704 734 Sent from my Electronic Device
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.