Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 07:15:56 -0400 From: Jason Cooper <osssecurity@...edaemon.net> To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Healing the bash fork On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 01:08:09PM +0200, Hanno Böck wrote: > Am Tue, 30 Sep 2014 19:19:55 -0400 (EDT) > schrieb "David A. Wheeler" <dwheeler@...eeler.com>: > > > Finally: *PLEASE* let me know if you have any good ideas on how to > > find vulnerabilities like this ahead-of-time. My article "How to > > Prevent the Next > > Hearbleed" (http://www.dwheeler.com/essays/heartbleed.html) lists a > > number of ways that Heartbleed-like vulnerabilities could have been > > detected ahead-of-time, in ways that are general enough to be > > useful. I'd like to do the same with Shellshock, so we can quickly > > eliminate a whole class of problems. > > The "class of problems" here is imho that we have a bunch of tools that > get rare attention from anyone, are run by few volunteers, but they're > an essential part in running the Internet. > > Just think about busybox, curl, wget, coreutils, gettext, gzip, ... - a > vuln in any of these could have severe consequences. > > Maybe the topic here should be: "How can we get the (whitehat) IT > seucrity community to have a deeper look at neglected but important > opensource projects." The LF has the Core Infrastructure Initiative: http://www.linuxfoundation.org/programs/core-infrastructure-initiative/faq thx, Jason.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.