Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 21:18:36 -0700
From: Tavis Ormandy <>
Subject: Re: Re: heap overflow in procmail

Rich Felker <> wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 09:44:12PM -0700, Tavis Ormandy wrote:
> > Rich Felker <> wrote:
> > > 
> > > Unless I'm misunderstanding your report, the problem is in the formail
> > > utility which comes with procmail, not procmail itself. This should be
> > > clarified in the title of the vuln, perhaps as "heap overflow in
> > > procmail's formail utility" rather than "heap overflow in procmail".
> > 
> > I'm not sure what "title" you mean, are you referring to my email
> > subject? If you are, I think "<problem> in <package>" is pretty
> > reasonable, but perhaps this is subjective (hah!).
> Yes, the email subject. "<problem> in <package>" seems reasonable, but
> when <package> is also the name of the main program in <package>, and the
> actual vuln is in a secondary program included with it, I think it's
> confusing.

You're free to form the subject line of your emails any crazy way you like,
you can put the entire email in there if it makes you happy.

If you want a list policy on Subject lines, talk to the moderators - not me.
I personally think information like version, platforms, programs and patches
belong in the body.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.