Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 13:04:58 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: CVE request: Proxmox VE < 3.2 user enumeration vulnerability

Hash: SHA1

> We would like to request 1 CVE for this vulnerability.

In general, there might be arguments in favor of either 0, 1, or
2 CVEs for this.


The PVE/API2/ change mentions both:

  to prevent user enumeration attacks

  to prevent timing attacks

but these don't seem to be independently relevant. The issue is that
an attacker could determine that they have discovered a valid username
because either:

  the error message changes (i.e., CWE-204)


  the response occurs more slowly (i.e., CWE-208)

It seems that there would be hardly any point in fixing the CWE-208
issue unless the CWE-204 issue were also fixed. That may be an
argument for combining the two into a single CVE.

The more controversial question is whether this type of a CWE-204
instance should continue to have a CVE ID in all future cases. mentions "Avoid
inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker
about internal state, such as whether a username is valid or not."
However, some authors outside MITRE have recently made an apparently
opposite assertion, e.g., "It is time to accept that account existence
is something an attacker can easily learn, and gain the usability
benefits of telling real people that they've misspelled their account
identifier." ("Threat Modeling: Designing for Security," ISBN
978-1-118-80999-0, page 262)

In this case, the commit message of "prevent user enumeration attacks"
might be considered close enough to a vendor statement that "the
Proxmox security policy is that authentication components must have
CWE-204 countermeasures, and lack of these countermeasures was an
implementation error."

- -- 
CVE assignment team, MITRE CVE Numbering Authority
M/S M300
202 Burlington Road, Bedford, MA 01730 USA
[ PGP key available through ]
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (SunOS)


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.