Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 01:25:13 +0200
From: Petr Matousek <>
Subject: CVE Request -- spice: unsafe clients ring access abort

Currently, both red_channel_pipes_add_type() and
red_channel_pipes_add_empty_msg() use plaing RING_FOREACH() which is not
safe versus removals from the ring within the loop body. Yet, when
(network) error does occur, the current item could be removed from the
ring down the road and the assertion in RING_FOREACH()'s ring_next()
could trip, causing the process containing the spice server to abort.

An user able to initiate spice connection to the guest could use this
flaw to crash the guest.

Upstream fix:


Petr Matousek / Red Hat Security Response Team

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.