Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D9C9E63.5060007@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 19:09:55 +0200
From: Jan Lieskovsky <jlieskov@...hat.com>
To: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org>
CC: oss-security <oss-security@...ts.openwall.com>,
        Jiri Popelka <jpopelka@...hat.com>
Subject: CVE Request -- dhcp: DoS (excessive CPU use) by opening an OMAPI
 connection


Hello Josh, Steve, vendors,

   A security flaw was found in the way DHCP (Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol)
server processed remote connections when the dhcpd was configured to provide
Object Management API (OMAPI) capability. A remote attacker could use this flaw
to cause denial of service (excessive CPU use and dhcpd daemon unreachability).

References:
[1] https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680298
[2] https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/2011-February/012780.html
[3] https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/2011-February/012781.html
[4] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666441
[5] http://www.mentby.com/Group/dhcp-users/omapi-not-working-in-420.html

Note: Though looks as minor / low severity issue, under proper configuration
       looks to be a way, how to get dhcpd completely unresponsive for further
       requests.

Could you allocate a CVE id for this? (though opened for discussion if this
being more to be a bug, than a real security issue).

Thanks && Regards, Jan.
--
Jan iankko Lieskovsky / Red Hat Security Response Team

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.