Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 12:09:35 -0400
From: Dan Rosenberg <dan.j.rosenberg@...il.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: CVE request: lxr

Yes, CVE-2010-1738 is a dupe of CVE-2010-1448.

-Dan

On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Nico Golde <oss-security+ml@...lde.de> wrote:
> Hi,
> * Josh Bressers <bressers@...hat.com> [2010-05-14 21:48]:
>> ----- "Dan Rosenberg" <dan.j.rosenberg@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Josh,
>> >
>> > The XSS in the title string was already assigned CVE-2010-1448.  Do
>> > you mean to assign issue #2, the XSS reflected in search results?
>> >
>>
>> Sigh, yes.
>>
>> So to sum it up:
>>
>> 1.  XSS in the ident parameter, as described in CVE-2009-4497.
>>
>> 2.  XSS that is reflected via the search results page after issuing
>> This one is now CVE-2010-1625
>>
>> 3. 3.  XSS that is reflected via the <title> tag on the search page, as
>> described in Raphael's original e-mail a few days ago, which Josh assigned
>> CVE-2010-1448
>
> CVE-2010-1738 seems to be a dupe of this?
>
> Cheers
> Nico
> --
> Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - nion@...ber.ccc.de - GPG: 0xA0A0AAAA
> For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.