Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:51:25 -0700
From: Vincent Danen <vdanen@...sec.ca>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: welcome

* [2008-02-17 02:17:25 +0300] Solar Designer wrote:

>On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 09:10:16PM -0900, Jonathan Smith wrote:
>> One nitpick before we get too established... would it be possible to
>> turn off reply-to-list? That is what "reply to all" is for in mail
>> clients :-)
>
>Yes, I can easily change this setting, but I like it the way it is now -
>and I suspect that many (most?) other list members do as well.  I find
>that having Reply-To on discussion lists pointing to the list address
>helps ensure that discussions don't unnecessarily go off-list and that
>list members are not unnecessarily CC'ed on responses.  (I realize that
>some actually prefer to be CC'ed because of the way their mail readers
>are configured.)  If/when we start getting a lot of desirable postings
>from non-members, we may change this setting to make it easier to CC
>such non-members on responses.
>
>If anyone else has an opinion on this matter (regarding this specific
>list indeed), please speak up.

I like the reply-to-list.  I usually forget to do a reply-to-all and end
up losing the list.  Bad habits on my part, and I don't think I'm alone
(either that or I'm a complete idiot).

>> I'm not sure if this is possible, but I'd like to see read-only
>> subscriptions. That is, folks can "subscribe" and get the list via email
>> without having to be approved to post to the list. See below for more
>> discussion on this isssue.
>
>The easiest way to achieve this, without patching the code, is to create
>a second ezmlm-idx list with announcement-only settings and subscribe it
>to this list.
>
>But I am not sure if having a completely read-only list is any better
>than having message pre-moderation.  The difference is in what happens
>to posting attempts from non-pre-approved addresses.  Do we want such
>messages bounced or submitted to a moderator?

I don't see the point of a read-only list when we have public archives.
It seems overly complex to me to do a read-only list subscribed to the
other list *and* have public archives.

I also think subscriptions should be moderated, and postings from
non-members should be moderated as well.  I think the last thing anyone
wants is to see spam on the list, or someone going on an off-topic
tirade or some other idiocy (if we wanted that, we'd all be chatting on
fd).

-- 
Vincent Danen @ http://linsec.ca/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.