[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0d7f71f4-3f16-09f2-db12-e2dab774469a@mirbsd.de>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 18:19:57 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@...bsd.de>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] aarch64: workaround for syscalls with sve
On Mon, 19 Oct 2026, Rich Felker wrote:
>output and moving further towards command line limits running ar and
>the libc.so link. It might be okay, just something to consider.
There’s two usual techniques against this:
- response files (mostly in the DOS world)
- packing .a (for ar) and .lo (ld -r, partial link but relocatable)
files per subdirectory and combining them at the end only
Not sure whether either is a good fit for musl, but they exist.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
„Cool, /usr/share/doc/mksh/examples/uhr.gz ist ja ein Grund,
mksh auf jedem System zu installieren.“
-- XTaran auf der OpenRheinRuhr, ganz begeistert
(EN: “[…]uhr.gz is a reason to install mksh on every system.”)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
