[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2a7b7d3d-6124-55c4-8253-020d2a11d2f6@mirbsd.de>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 22:13:24 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@...bsd.de>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
cc: Ricardo Barreira <rsf@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ldso: increase buffer size to fix loading error
with long paths
On Tue, 1 Sep 2026, Rich Felker wrote:
>The intent of not using PATH_MAX is to avoid clobbering a whole extra
>page of stack that will never again be used at load-time in every
>single dynamic-linked program. But I suppose we could do something
What about putting it into bss or allocating it once but
statically-sized, then munmapping it once no longer needed?
Just a shot into the blue, not something I actually looked at.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
https://toot.mirbsd.org/@mirabilos/statuses/01KNQD9RNZM1Z2A61AZHG857MP
↑ long list of references on why “AI”/LLMs are bad for everyone
also: ↓ from https://toot.cat/@dthompson/117180306961006760
> "responsible LLM usage" is the "clean coal" of the tech world
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
